Every Brilliant Thing

“If you live a long life and get to the end of it without ever once having felt crushingly depressed, then you probably haven’t been paying attention.”

“Every brilliant thing” is a one-man show about …depression. It was actually introduced by a friend who subscribed to Befrienders’ page on facebook and noticed the play. And it’s a comedy (the big guy sitting next to me had been laughing real hard) (yes the comedy is about depression), also interactive. It will run till this Sunday, tickets and details are available here. (Spoiler alert: I’m sharing my thought about it, I guess it’s better not read it till you have seen it, that’s if you intend to go for it.)

Firstly it’s the quote above. I noticed I asked myself inside, “have I not been paying attention?” Have I? Have you? Perhaps I haven’t lived long enough (haha). Although I doubt the validity of this quote, I love it still. It reminds me of living mindfully, which is what most people including me lack nowadays.

This spontaneously brings me to my second thought. When the actor, as a teenager, realised how much easily he felt happy as a child. How most if not all of us, when we were little, notice joyful things, act out our joy, feel happy and contented easily and casually. It’s like being happy ‘naturally’ is exclusive for children. When you get into adulthood, you lose that and have to deal with a lot of disappointment, depression, fear, sorrow etc. But why so? Perhaps as an adult we can also appreciate little brilliant thing better? Like having a friend close enough to ask him/her to check if your teeth have got broccoli on them?

Oh yes I forgot to mention that “Every Brilliant Thing” is about this boy who wrote a long list of everything worth living for after discovered that the mother attempted ending her life. So yea, every little, brilliant thing. In no order of preference, the first item was “ice cream”, the 7th item was “people falling over”, the 201th “hammocks”, the 1092th “conversation”, 1655th “Christopher Walken’s hair”. Does such list help? I personally do not think it helps if you wrote it for someone who’s suicidal, but it would be helpful if the person is motivated enough to create such list for him or herself. One of the problems is probably “will she be able to notice?” The mother ended her life still, despite all the efforts of the boy.

Then this Samaritans’ Best Practice Suicide Reporting Tips was mentioned, it’s about what the Samaritans advises journalists on how to report suicide news. If you briefly go through the list, you will probably immediately find out that our reporters do not follow the tips at all, sadly. Yes and each time shortly after a celebrity or a famous person killed him or herself (a widely publicised suicide) the suicide rates peak. (So hey one of the reasons I have stopped reading news, is that they can be really depressing nowadays). Perhaps including some sources of support at the end can be really helpful. In Malaysia, you may call the Befrienders any time 03-79568144/5 or email sam@befrienders.com.my (visit their website here). 

One final thing that made me “nodded” during the show (friend said she noticed I had been nodding a lot – it’s really just a habit, like when I’m giving talks I tend to look for this kind of audience… those who nod a lot!), is when someone says to you “you should find someone to talk to, a professional one”, you think you know yourself best, you know mental illness best, you know it all, why would you need to seek professional help, that person can’t know you better than you do etc. But really, there must be reasons for someone to say that to you, and there really can’t be any harm done for you to speak to someone. Just bear this in mind, don’t get defensive.

I wasn’t happy at all with the show starting really late (written in the email to be there 45 minutes early and the show didn’t start till 30 minutes after its scheduled time, that was really a long wait!). But I do quite enjoy it, consider it my first experience on one-man show (is Derren Brown’s considered as one?).

Non-blind Placebo

Placebo is sometimes called a sugar pill, indicating that it is medically ineffectual, yet a person given such ineffectual treatment will often have an actual improvement in their condition. 

One key thing with the use of placebo, is that it involves deceiving the person receiving it. For example, before many drugs get into the market, they would surely have to be tested against placebo. And people who are being tested, all would think that they are receiving the drug, though some do not know that they are actually taking a placebo, are serving as the “control group”.

So what’s this “non-blind placebo”? In the 1960s, two researchers published an unusual article “Nonblind Placebo Trial: An exploration of neurotic patients.” Non-blind, i.e. the neurotic patients were told that what they were to take are sugar pills, with no active ingredients in it. Fifteen neurotic participants from a psychiatric clinic were selected, and they each read the following script:

“Mr Doe, at the intake conference we discussed your problems and it was decided to consider further the possibility and the need of treatment for you before we make a final recommendation next week. Meanwhile, we have a week between now and our next appointment, and we would like to do something to give you some relief from your symptoms. Many different kinds of tranquilisers and similar pills have been used for condition such as yours, and many of them have helped. Many people with your kind of condition have also been helped by what are sometimes called ‘sugar pills’, and we feel that so-called sugar pill may help you, too. Do you know what a sugar pill is? A sugar pill is a pill with no medicine in it at all. I think this pill will help you as it has helped so many others. Are you willing to try this pill?” (Park & Covi, 1965)

One of the 15 patients refused to take part. Of the remaining 14 patients, 13 showed signs of significant improvement across different measures. The researchers note that the improvement of 41% found here was greater than the improvement found in previous studies of real drugs, using the same measures.

It might sound ludicrous but this is what has been found. (Definitely have to replicate this study when I get the opportunity). What do you think about this research finding?

It’s all about one’s expectation, this is what I think – what you believe and expect is going to happen. You can be given a sugar pill believing that it will do you good and expecting to get better, or you can be given a world most advanced and expensive pill thinking that it is useless and expecting to get worse. So, no matter what kind of treatment you are receiving, be it drug or psychotherapy or hypnotherapy or counselling, have the belief that you will get better, expect that you will get better – these will definitely help! (Self-fulfilling prophecy!)

What is most important to get better from mental illness?

Sometimes people ask me what I think is the most important “thing” that can help the patient to recover from mental illness. Many would guess it is the patient’s compliance to treatment, support and love from family members, getting help from the right person/place etc. Yes these are all quite important.

But no, I think it’s the patient’s insight to his/her problems, that’s the most important factor.

First you need to be able to recognise that you have a problem. And then you seek help, and then you comply to the treatment, and then maybe your family support you throughout, and then you learn about your illness and how to prevent relapses. Without insight, none of this is possible.

Yes I have mentioned before that for some patients with no insights to their problems, sometimes family members can put medicine into their food/drink. But do you think family member can consistently and successfully put the medicine each and every time? Do you think they can fully recover after a period of time?  Do you think next time they have a relapse the patient can spot the early warning signs themselves? Do you think family members can be there all the time? Do you think about the consequences if and when the patient finds out?

Many people don’t recognise their problem as a problem, and allow it to worsen. It’s a bit like liver cancer, you don’t feel pain, you don’t see any symptoms, by the time it’s discovered, the cancer could have spreaded quite badly. But what we are talking about here is worse than liver cancer, some people with clinical depression don’t recognise it even until the time they jump down from the building and end their lives – they still think it’s their problems that they can’t cope, can’t face and manage adversity in life. They didn’t see that it could be their hormones, their brain circuits, and that maybe they need help (not on adversity in life), on their mood disorder (and perhaps learning some coping skills and become more resilient), and then they can face all the challenges by themselves again.

One’s insight to their problem affects all stages of treatment. Recognising symptoms of hearing voices as mental illness, recognising the need to seek help, recognising the need to be compliant to treatment, recognising how the illness functions, recognising how to prevent relapses, recognising when to see doctor whenever needed.

So sometimes I’ll tell people, it’s good enough that you recognise it as a problem and that you need help. Quite often this is to people with bipolar disorder (don’t recognise the manic phase as problem, as they enjoy it!), morbid jealousy (insist that it’s the partner that’s unfaithful, not their excessive jealousy and suspicion as the problems), schizophrenia (thinking the voices are real, they are not problems to them), depression (genuinely believing that they are useless, they can’t cope, they are stupid etc instead of seeing those as just negative automated thoughts) etc. Don’t worry too much once you have got the insights, there will be people trying to help you along the way. All you need to do first of all, is to reach out, really.

催眠是怎样的一种状态?

催眠究竟是怎样的一种状态?和平时的“状态”比起来,有什么不同?它是特殊的一种状态吗?

我们该如何测量这个“状态”?即,如何知道一个人已经“进入状态”中?当他感到放松的时候?当他对催眠的暗示产生反应的时候?当脑电波出现特定变化时?

其实很多人和我一样,一开始接触催眠,都觉得它神奇与充满魔力,也觉得催眠一定就是一种“特殊状态”。我想我比大多数人有幸吧… 去学了比较基于科学研究的催眠疗法,明白了催眠的本质。(还真的应该谢谢朋友佩雯,是她找到了英国催眠学院,和我一起报读 --虽然最后她并没有完成…)。

所以今天,我要从一个科学的角度、一个循证、基于实验与临床研究的角度,说说“催眠状态”。而这可能会让你相当失望,因为从脑部扫描来看,找不到被催眠者有什么特殊的脑部状态或所谓的“恍惚状态” (trance),它和平时一样,只是会因为暗示(suggestion)的不同,而出现不同的脑电波,比如放松的暗示产生特定的脑电波,但催眠并不是放松!在激烈运动的情况下,人们也还是可以被催眠的。或者你看看舞台催眠表演,当一个高暗示感受性的人接受暗示想象自己是一个5岁的小孩的时候,他表现出来的,也不是放松--而这并不代表他不在催眠“状态”中。

上课实际操作的时候,很多学员会很担心和他们的来访者在催眠过程中沟通,担心这会影响他们的“催眠状态”。但其实,催眠过程中,被催眠者是可以说话,可以描述他们想象的画面,可以回答问题,可以…. 而不影响他们的。

而催眠之父James Braid 把催眠定义成“单一预期主导主意或画面的集中注意力” (“focused attention upon an expectant dominant idea or image”)。没有提起任何特殊状态。确实,催眠本来就是暗示的一门科学与艺术,而不是诱发任何“恍惚状态”或特殊的意识状态。后来许多研究学家发现,任何可以在催眠中进行的事,都可以在催眠外进行(也就是平时的情况下,或只告诉他们这是关于想象的练习、或一些需要完成的任务),虽然在一些情况中没有催眠的效果可能稍微低一些。

所以从社会心理学家的角度,催眠的行为最基本的目标,在于表现得像一个被催眠者,而这是不断地被执行者定义同时不断地被来访者理解的(White, 1941)。

简单来说,被催眠,就是“扮得像自己被催眠一样”,所以你怎么理解催眠,催眠就是什么!如果你相信催眠就是放松,你就会产生相应的反应;你相信催眠会令你失忆,你就可能失忆;如果你相信它可以帮助你减缓疼痛,它就可以……

好,那如果催眠不是什么特殊状态(尤其提倡催眠是特殊状态的人,记得问他们证据在哪里),那我们怎么知道一个人是否被催眠了呢?答案就在于暗示感受性(suggestibility),即,这个人对暗示产生多大的反应。这其实是相当明显的答案,在催眠里如果你没有对暗示产生反应,那管你什么特殊状态,也没有意义。而每个人天生的暗示感受性虽然不同,但这却是可以被训练提升的(催眠技巧训练其中最为进行大量研究的是 Spanos 的 Carleton skills training programme, CSTP)。

所以到头来,催眠的过程,就决定于被试者的态度(积极,消极,被动?)和动机意愿、还有他们对于催眠的理解(被催眠者应该扮演什么角色?)。它并不是什么特殊状态,但很多时候,把普通的一个过程贴上“催眠”的标签,却可以带来更显著的效果(有此好处,why not?)。

N.B. 本文参考 Donald Robertson 的 The Practice of Cognitive Behavioural Hypnotherapy 一书。作者乃是英国催眠与催眠治疗学院(The UK College of Hypnosis and Hypnotherapy)的创始人,也是我的导师。

Anxiety VS Depression

A brief update:

Hui Bee is away for replenishment from 29th Aug to 3rd Oct. When she is back, she will again be very busy preparing for the Stage II of CBH diploma course in BeiJing. After 3 years of regular updates, huibee.com is likely to be quiet for a couple of months. But she promises that she will definitely be back here. 

焦虑 (Anxiety) 和抑郁 (Depression) 的特点

焦虑和抑郁的不同
焦虑和抑郁的相似处

又是我早年制作的表,分辨焦虑和抑郁的相同和不同之处。这只是简略概括来说,每个人的情况症状都不同,绝对不能作为诊断用途。

Introducing “Outliers” (2008)

By Malcolm Gladwell
By Malcolm Gladwell

This book is a Christmas present from a friend in the UK. It’d been lying in my shelf for at least 2 or 3 years till i picked it up. And guess what, I’ve really enjoyed it. I don’t understand how i could have not heard about this author all these years. Malcolm Gladwell, one of the Time Magazine’s 100 most influential people in 2005.

“OUTLIERS – the story of success”. There are a lot of interesting research findings in it, it doesn’t just tell you how to be successful, not at all (in fact in a lot of cases it’s telling you you can’t be the extraordinary one because of …). But he really helps to make sense of many things…

Now i know why in my class there are always more students born in the first half of the year, and what we might do to change this; how certain people become so successful not due to their “gifted talent” but they’ve worked more than 10,000 hours before they reached where they’re today; why certain airlines of certain social psychologists defined cultures are more likely to crash; why maths of children from certain regions of Asia are better than the rest of the world and it has nothing to do with their “IQ” or “inherited abilities”; how children are brought up matters a lot – parenting styles, what they do during summers, social classes too! Rich students learnt more in the summer term than throughout the whole school year! Etc etc.

I don’t want to spoil the book. But I’m going to read another of his book. It’s not so much clinical psychology, but psychology in general. Anyone can read, anyone! And I’d particularly recommend it to parents and parents-to-be.

“Outliers are those who have been given opportunities — and who have had the strength and presence of mind to seize them”